Media Blockade
Lawyers for Britain article
https://lawyersforbritain.org/article-50-of-the-treaty-on-european-union-what-it-actually-says
Read the conclusions and Remember - The People who come out of retirement (Like Barr) have no agenda and no fear of losing or damaging their career!
chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://lawyersforbritain.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Article-50-TEU-Part-I-and-Part-II-23.5.19-by-Stanley-Brodie-QC.pdf
READ THIS: What the establishment including Farage fear most! A ruling that confirms this ..
CONCLUSIONS Stating the outcome shortly, it would seem to be as follows:
(i)The application by the Prime Minister for an extension of time until June 30th under the proviso to Article 50, made on or about the 14th March 2019, was legally valid, but was rejected by the EU.
(ii)This was followed by the Agreement proposed by the EU. It did not comply with the terms of the proviso; nor was Article 50 referred to or relied on by the EU. It was not effective to stop the Article 50 process running up to and including the 29th March at 11 p.m. Whichever way one looks at it, the Agreement was either unlawful or made for an unlawful purpose or ultra vires .That means that the UK left the EU on the 29th March 2019 by default as there was no valid or lawful impediment to prevent it.
8 (iii) Recently the EU has imposed a further extension of time on the UK until the 31st October 2019.This imposition cannot be supported by the terms of Article 50, which seems to have been ignored. It is an example of the willingness of the relevant parties to agree extensions of time without limitation, no doubt based on the notes issued by the civil service.
(iv) The irony seems to be that ever since the 29th March 2019 , the United Kingdom has left the European Union “ without a deal “. I need hardly point out that there are consequences for the European Election.Blackstone Chambers Stanley Brodie QC 3rd June 2019
30:59
2:16
3:21
16:18
17:19
17:13
2:38
