Countries that consistently aim for elimination—ie, maximum action to control SARS-CoV-2 and stop community transmission as quickly as possible—have generally fared better than countries that opt for mitigation—ie, action increased in a stepwise, targeted way to reduce cases so as not to overwhelm health-care systems.
COVID-19 deaths per 1 million population in OECD countries that opted for elimination (Australia, Iceland, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea) have been about 25 times lower than in other OECD countries that favored mitigation.
There is also increasing consensus that elimination is preferable to mitigation in relation to a country's economic performance.
Among OECD countries, liberties were most severely impacted in those that chose mitigation, whereas swift lockdown measures—in line with elimination—were less strict and of shorter duration.
Evidence suggests that countries that opt for rapid action to eliminate SARS-CoV-2—with the strong support of their inhabitants—also better protect their economies and minimize restrictions on civil liberties compared with those that strive for mitigation.
Source: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00978-8/fulltext
Music: https://youtu.be/TIH7GRcQ6dA
Follow
➡️Telegram: https://t.me/REALPOSEIDON
➡️Dlive: https://dlive.tv/REALPOSEIDON
➡️Trovo: https://trovo.live/REALPOSEIDON
➡️Poseidon Vlog: https://www.youtube.com/CLOWNWORLD
➡️Poseidon Archive: https://www.youtube.com/POSEIDONARCHIVE
➡️Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/poseidon/
➡️Odysee: https://odysee.com/@POSEIDON
Support
➡️Buy me a beer: https://buymeacoffee.com/realposeidon
➡️Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/poseidon7
➡️SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/poseidon
➡️Mugs & T-shirts: https://teespring.com/stores/poseidon-5
➡️Bitcoin: 3CGD2KZ1NczcLomVCRWMBkkjDs4oaiu9Mc
4:51
2:02
2:28:07
3:06:21
31:43
1:24:54
2:06:02
1:30:10
4:44
2:52
1:35:00
